A judge has been sacked from his position following an investigation by the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office into allegations of “highly sexualised image” sent to a court employee.
District judge Andrew Simpson, who served at the Newcastle Civil and Family Courts and Tribunals Centre, was found to have engaged in conduct that was “wholly inappropriate” and “represented a serious failure to meet the standards expected”.
Lady Chief Justice Baroness Carr and Lord Chancellor David Lammy determined his actions constituted gross misconduct involving “a very serious failure of integrity”, concluding his service was “no longer tenable”.
The investigation was prompted by complaints that Simpson had “behaved inappropriately towards a number of staff” at the court.
Allegations included claims of “unwanted physical contact”, alongside “overly familiar and unprofessional conduct” in his interactions with colleagues.
The complaint further alleged Simpson had shared photographs from social gatherings held outside the workplace, among them the sexualised image at the centre of the case.
Additionally, he was accused of using “highly inappropriate terms” to describe himself and fellow staff members in correspondence sent via his official judicial email account.
Simpson accepted that some of his behaviour had been inappropriate, but maintained he had no “improper intent”.
District judge Andrew Simpson, who served at the Newcastle Civil and Family Courts and Tribunals Centre
|
GOOGLE STREET VIEW
A disciplinary panel had initially recommended Simpson receive a formal reprimand, the most severe sanction available short of dismissal.
They concluded “whilst his intentions were not improper, his actions were seriously misguided”.
However, Baroness Carr and Mr Lammy overruled this recommendation, determining Simpson’s conduct “amounted to gross misconduct which involved a very serious failure of integrity”.
The pair noted that his behaviour had been repeated over time, and represented an abuse of his judicial position.
They further observed his actions had caused distress to staff members, created a harmful working environment, and damaged the reputation of the judiciary as a whole.
Simpson himself described his approach to communication as “informal but consistently polite and friendly”.
He claimed certain incidents were simply efforts to “support or cheer up staff during difficult periods”.
David Lammy determined Simpson’s conduct ‘amounted to gross misconduct which involved a very serious failure of integrity’
|
REUTERSHe also cast doubt on the motivations of individuals who had backed the complaints against him.
This challenge proved counterproductive, with Baroness Carr and Mr Lammy finding his “unfounded challenge to the motivation of those supporting the complaint” only aggravated the situation.
Ultimately, they concluded they were “not satisfied that he had demonstrated sufficient insight into the seriousness of his conduct”.
Simpson had been admitted to the Roll of Solicitors in 2000 and took up his district judge role in December 2022.