British BulletinBritish Bulletin
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Health
  • Sports
  • Tech & Science
  • Travel
  • Spotlight
  • More
    • Press Release
What's On

Watch BBC Radio Manchester’s in-depth interview with Stockport boss Jimmy McNulty | Manchester News

14 August 2026

Princess Beatrice attends funeral of Sarah Ferguson’s ex-boyfriend Paddy McNally

14 August 2026

Major banks offer millions of Britons up to £300 cash for simple switch – but deadline looms

14 August 2026

Toyota and Lexus hybrid cars under fire for ‘trapping’ drivers in vehicles amid battery issues

14 August 2026

Two prisoners charged after attack on Sara Sharif’s father | UK News

14 August 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Web Stories
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
British Bulletin
Subscribe
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Health
  • Sports
  • Tech & Science
  • Travel
  • Spotlight
  • More
    • Press Release
British BulletinBritish Bulletin
Home » HMRC rule change leaves thousands of business owners at risk of new penalties
Business

HMRC rule change leaves thousands of business owners at risk of new penalties

By britishbulletin.com5 August 20264 Mins Read
HMRC rule change leaves thousands of business owners at risk of new penalties
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

Thousands of directors running small, family-owned businesses could face £60 fines under new HMRC tax rules.

Many may not realise they need to provide extra information on their self-assessment tax return, raising the risk of being penalised.


HMRC has introduced new reporting requirements for directors of close companies from the 2025/26 tax year. They must now disclose more details about their dividend income and shareholdings on the SA102 Employment pages of their self-assessment tax return.

The deadline to submit the new information is 31 January 2027. However, accountants say the changes have received little attention, leaving many business owners unaware they need to take action.

Emma Rawson, of the Association of Taxation Technicians, said: “Our concern is people won’t know about this, won’t do it and will get penalised.”

Chris Etherington, of accountancy firm RSM, said: “These new reporting requirements have not been widely publicised, so directors may not know they exist or how the rules apply to them.”

A close company is broadly defined as a UK-resident firm controlled by its directors or by five or fewer shareholders. Directors of such companies must now confirm on the SA102 form that they held a directorship during the tax year and that the business was close.

They must also supply the company’s name and registration number, the total dividend income received from the firm, even if that amount was zero, and their percentage shareholding based on the nominal value of shares held.

Where a director’s stake changed during the year, they are required to report the highest percentage owned at any point. Those holding directorships at more than one close company must fill in a separate SA102 for each role.

HMRC can levy a £60 penalty for every piece of information that is missing or wrong. Larger penalties may follow if errors lead to an inaccurate tax return.

The ATT has raised concerns that HMRC’s own guidance on the new rules is contradictory. Notes accompanying the 2025/26 tax return state that directors need to complete the Employment pages if they “received income as a company director”.

HMRC has separately confirmed that the pages must be filled in even when no income was received

| GETTY

Yet HMRC has separately confirmed that the pages must be filled in even when no income was received. The tax authority said it is updating this guidance.

There is also a risk that the changes could trip up directors who accidentally fail to declare dividend income. Under the new system, dividends from the company must be reported on the SA102 form as well as being declared separately elsewhere in the return.

Ms Rawson said: “We worry people will accidentally not declare dividend income.” She added: “It would seem really unfair to penalise people for not declaring income by mistake.”

Business owners who received no dividends must still enter £0 rather than leaving the box empty, or they could be penalised.

The changes could trip up directors who accidentally fail to declare dividend income

| GETTY

The ATT has urged HMRC to waive penalties for the 2025/26 tax year to give directors time to get to grips with the new obligations.

HMRC brought in the rules as part of a broader drive to narrow the tax gap. Small businesses are responsible for 62 per cent of the UK’s £59.2bn in uncollected tax.

The tax authority is also looking at going further. In March 2026, HMRC launched a consultation on requiring close companies to report all transactions with their shareholders and other participators.

This would cover payments made by cash or bank transfer, asset sales and purchases, dividends, loans and any other transfers of value.

Companies would need to provide details such as the recipient’s name, address and National Insurance number so HMRC could cross-check against personal tax returns. That consultation closed on 10 June 2026.

An HMRC spokesman said these changes will help them better support directors with their tax affairs

| GETTY

An HMRC spokesman said: “These changes will improve our understanding of how directors are paid so we can better support them with their tax affairs. We’ve engaged extensively with stakeholders since we started consulting on the changes three years ago and we’re updating our guidance to help directors get things right.”

The spokesman added: “We’ll be taking a considered approach to directors who’ve made reasonable efforts to meet their obligations.”

The new reporting burden arrives alongside the rollout of Making Tax Digital, which obliges sole traders and landlords to send quarterly updates to HMRC. The first filing deadline for those earning more than £50,000 a year falls on 7 August.

Separately, HMRC’s proposals to make self-employed workers pay tax more frequently have drawn criticism. The Chartered Institute of Taxation has warned the plans could leave millions dealing with “confusion” and “cash-flow issues”.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Keep Reading

Major banks offer millions of Britons up to £300 cash for simple switch – but deadline looms

13 rules and allowances that could cut YOUR bill

HMRC slammed over ‘two-tier’ inheritance tax as pensions to miss vital relief

HMRC takes £56million from savers through Lifetime ISA withdrawal penalties

Andy Burnham told to let retirees ‘sacrifice’ state pensions in exchange for OBEs

Private school fees soar to £216,000 amid VAT raid

Electrician’s apprentice on skipping UCAS and university for a potential £100k a year trade

Grandparents rush to pay grandchildren’s university fees to cut inheritance tax bills

High street blow as Ladbrokes owner warns more betting shops will close amid £250million tax hit

Editors Picks

Princess Beatrice attends funeral of Sarah Ferguson’s ex-boyfriend Paddy McNally

14 August 2026

Major banks offer millions of Britons up to £300 cash for simple switch – but deadline looms

14 August 2026

Toyota and Lexus hybrid cars under fire for ‘trapping’ drivers in vehicles amid battery issues

14 August 2026

Two prisoners charged after attack on Sara Sharif’s father | UK News

14 August 2026

Subscribe to News

Get the latest Brittan News and Updates directly to your inbox.

Latest News

Tonda Eckert: Southampton start season with boss’ future unknown

14 August 2026

More than 50 masked protesters gather in Clacton just minutes before by-election declaration

14 August 2026

13 rules and allowances that could cut YOUR bill

14 August 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest TikTok Instagram
© 2026 British Bulletin. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Advertise
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.