No-one can be certain what happens now. And no-one knows what the future for Infantino is.
Fifa is yet to respond to Uefa’s statement, which was followed up by another from Concacaf, which governs football in North and Central America and hosted this year’s World Cup, saying their 41 members rejected the proposals.
Yet, in a sense, it is not Fifa’s argument.
Football Association chair Debbie Hewitt is a Fifa vice-president. She spoke out against the plan at Uefa’s emergency meeting on Thursday. The FA said it stands “shoulder to shoulder with our European colleagues” on the matter.
Scottish FA president Mike Mulraney is also chair of Fifa’s finance committee. The Scottish FA’s statement said the organisation “agrees unequivocally” with Uefa’s stance.
The repeated responses from those who have spoken out are of fury at the lack of proper consultation and lack of dialogue from Infantino, including with his Fifa colleagues, as much as with the proposals themselves.
“Anger,” said one source, when asked for the prevailing mood at Uefa’s emergency meeting.
Infantino became Fifa president in 2016 when he beat Asian Football Confederation president Sheikh Salman al-Khalifa by 115 votes to 88. The Swiss is due to stand for a fourth term in March.
Prior to this week, it had been anticipated he would be re-elected unopposed. FAs around the world, including some in Europe, have already confirmed their intention to support the 56-year-old.
But sources say in addition to rejecting Infantino’s plan, the vast majority of the Concacaf members are either losing faith in the Fifa president’s ability to govern the game, or have lost it altogether.
Now there is talk of trying to find someone to stand against him.
The name of Nasser Al-Khelaifi has been mentioned. This is understandable. Qatari Al-Khelaifi is already one of the most powerful figures in football, not only through his status as president of back-to-back Champions League winners Paris St-Germain but his leadership of European clubs.
Previously known as the European Clubs’ Association, Al-Khelaifi took over as chairman in the aftermath of the other seismic event that threatened to pull the game apart – the ill-fated European Super League, which collapsed within 48 hours in 2021.
Al-Khelaifi presided over a name change – to European Football Clubs. More importantly, he expanded it to over 800 members. Of the biggest clubs, only Real Madrid remain outside.
In theory, he would be the best person to challenge Infantino. But he doesn’t want to. “He genuinely, genuinely, genuinely doesn’t want the job,” was the response of a source close to the 52-year-old when asked about the possibility on Thursday.
Historically, sitting Fifa presidents are not challenged in elections. The last president to lose an election was Englishman Sir Stanley Rous when he was beaten by Brazilian Joao Havelange in 1974.
“I don’t know, in all honesty,” said McAllister, when asked if Infantino will keep his job.
Former FA chairman David Bernstein was asked the same question by BBC Sport.
“In a normal organisation, if he has to back down due to something of this magnitude he’d probably be shown the door,” Bernstein said.
“But Fifa is not a normal organisation. If he has the support of enough of the national associations, he will continue.”
Former Uefa chief executive Lars-Christer Olsson told the BBC that Infantino has overplayed his hand and his position could be in trouble.
He suggested Fifa should instigate a reform where the presidency circulates around figures from different confederations “rather than giving people so much power” as it has done with Infantino and his predecessors, Switzerland’s Sepp Blatter and Brazil’s Havelange.
When asked if Infantino should be removed from his role, Olsson said: “I think that should be a new start for football.”