British BulletinBritish Bulletin
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Health
  • Sports
  • Tech & Science
  • Travel
  • Spotlight
  • More
    • Press Release
What's On

England v New Zealand – second test, The Oval: England off to strong start despite Stoke’s absence

17 June 2026

Russian Navy attack is ‘huge wake up call’ for Keir Starmer to ‘get serious’ on defence, Tory MP warns

17 June 2026

Prince William chats with Gareth Southgate at Royal Ascot ahead of England’s opening game

17 June 2026

Kaleb Cooper brands Lisa Hogan ‘better’ than Jeremy Clarkson on farm as she steps in amid star’s cancer news

17 June 2026

Warning of ‘hidden’ prostate cancer symptoms as presenter discloses diagnosis

17 June 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Web Stories
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
British Bulletin
Subscribe
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Health
  • Sports
  • Tech & Science
  • Travel
  • Spotlight
  • More
    • Press Release
British BulletinBritish Bulletin
Home » Controversial wind farm with eight 150-metre turbines rejected by court after ministerial approval
News

Controversial wind farm with eight 150-metre turbines rejected by court after ministerial approval

By britishbulletin.com18 February 20264 Mins Read
Controversial wind farm with eight 150-metre turbines rejected by court after ministerial approval
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

Campaigners are celebrating after appeal judges overturned Government approval for a wind farm in the Scottish Borders despite the project application being rejected three times since 2020.

Energiekontor UK Ltd planned to develop the site near Heriot in the Moorfoot Hills south of Edinburgh with eight 150-metre turbines capable of generating 36MW.


The project was first given the green light in January 2025 by a Scottish Government reporter, but following an appeal lodged by a company that owns the nearby Raeburn Farm, Court of Session appeal judges have now upheld the arguments made by the farm’s lawyers.

Lawyers instructed by Raeburn Farm argued the reporter did not follow correct legal proceedings when arriving at their decision.

The submitted proposal included plans for the construction of eight turbines and other infrastructure, but did not provide sufficient details of the off-site grid connection required for sending generated power to the electrical grid.

As a result, Raeburn’s lawyers argued the approval process could not have considered the environmental impact and was therefore unlawful.

On behalf of the judges – Lady Wise, Lord Pentland and Lord Ericht – Lady Wise ruled there were oversights in the reporter’s approval process and “failing to conduct the necessary fact specific evaluation of the proposal”.

She wrote, “It was incumbent upon him to do so before reaching a conclusion on whether the wind farm and grid connection constituted a single project for which an EIA (Environmental Impact Assessment) report that analysed the potentially significant cumulative effects of both aspects was required.

Appeal judges overturned Government approval for a wind farm in the Scottish Borders

|

PA

“We reject the submission made at the hearing before us by Senior Counsel for the respondents that any error by the reporter on this point was not a material one,” she said, reaffirming, “this was a material error”.

The trio of judges reversed the decision made in January 2025 and instructed it be reevaluated by “a different reporter for a fresh decision”.

The Scottish Borders Council first denied the application in 2020 due to the “unacceptable significant adverse impacts on the landscape”.

The developer revised their project plans to relocate the turbines and increase the original 130m height to 150m, resubmitting the proposal in 2024.

The Scottish Borders Council first denied the application in 2020

|

PA

Council planning officers initially approved the revision, but later reversed their position following significant public outcry, rejecting the plans for a second time and reiterated “significant landscape and visual impacts”.

The second Council denial prompted Energiekontor UK to successfully appeal the decision to the Scottish Government.

In his report, the government reporter at the centre of Raeburn Farm’s appeal noted the development would be responsible for “significant adverse landscape and visual effects”, but accepted “”this is to be expected for a proposal of this kind”.

Though relief at the court’s denial of Energiekontor’s application may be short-lived, community action groups are now looking upon the Wull Muir decision as a case study for other ongoing disputes.

Lyndsey Ward, an admin of the Communities B4 Power Companies Facebook Group, has been pushing back on wind farm developers for 15 years.

Following Lady Wise’s judgement, she wrote, “It makes my heart sing to see Energiekontor going through the wringer.

“What an appalling company they are: cocky, dismissive and smug are the words that come to mind after attending their ‘consultations’ in my community.”

Ms Ward welcomed the “court slap for Wull Muir wind abomination” for not considering the grid connection.

Referencing other Energiekontor development proposals, she said: “they have already had a push back in Sutherland for their unbelievable Strath Oykel development that the witless Scottish government passed despite reporters saying no.”

She says she is “aiming for the hat-trick here in Kilmorack”.

Six years after Scottish Borders Council first denied Energiekontor’s applications, the options laid out in Lady Wise’s judgement means that if the developer plans to proceed with the Wull Muir project, it will be required to conduct a thorough environmental impact assessment – including the infrastructure required in exporting electricity to the grid – to be reconsidered for approval.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Keep Reading

Women’s One-Day Cup: Wins for Hampshire, Somerset, Yorkshire and Lancashire | Manchester News

Drivers risk £2,500 fine for flying England flags ahead of Croatia clash

Britain’s strictest headteacher says school shunned by middle class despite students achieving highest grades

Travellers pitch up on land next to working men’s club in family neighbourhood

Man charged with arson attack on memorial wall in North London

Unique memorial honouring armed forces personnel who died by suicide given guard of honour by veterans

WW1 grenade sparks major evacuation after being handed to auction to be sold

Blind veteran, 91, honoured with prestigious award for creative woodwork

British taxpayers to subsidise French costs as ‘wasteful’ rules mean £16bn sold off for cheap overseas

Editors Picks

Russian Navy attack is ‘huge wake up call’ for Keir Starmer to ‘get serious’ on defence, Tory MP warns

17 June 2026

Prince William chats with Gareth Southgate at Royal Ascot ahead of England’s opening game

17 June 2026

Kaleb Cooper brands Lisa Hogan ‘better’ than Jeremy Clarkson on farm as she steps in amid star’s cancer news

17 June 2026

Warning of ‘hidden’ prostate cancer symptoms as presenter discloses diagnosis

17 June 2026

Subscribe to News

Get the latest Brittan News and Updates directly to your inbox.

Latest News

World Cup 2026: Jude Bellingham set to start in England number 10 role against Croatia

17 June 2026

Women’s One-Day Cup: Wins for Hampshire, Somerset, Yorkshire and Lancashire | Manchester News

17 June 2026

Retired couple fired upon by Russian warship slam Labour over ‘inflammatory’ response

17 June 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest TikTok Instagram
© 2026 British Bulletin. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Advertise
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.