British BulletinBritish Bulletin
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Health
  • Sports
  • Tech & Science
  • Travel
  • Spotlight
  • More
    • Press Release
What's On

Car explodes outside Belfast police station in suspected ‘New IRA’ attack

26 April 2026

‘Kick him out!’ Labour MPs urged to ‘grow a backbone’ and boot PM

26 April 2026

King Charles signals possible changes to US state visit in fresh statement after White House shooting

26 April 2026

Lloyds Bank, HSBC and NatWest issue major customer rule update

26 April 2026

Fuel duty revenue falls as drivers cut back on driving amid rising costs and global tensions

26 April 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Web Stories
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
British Bulletin
Subscribe
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Health
  • Sports
  • Tech & Science
  • Travel
  • Spotlight
  • More
    • Press Release
British BulletinBritish Bulletin
Home » Controversial wind farm with eight 150-metre turbines rejected by court after ministerial approval
News

Controversial wind farm with eight 150-metre turbines rejected by court after ministerial approval

By britishbulletin.com18 February 20264 Mins Read
Controversial wind farm with eight 150-metre turbines rejected by court after ministerial approval
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

Campaigners are celebrating after appeal judges overturned Government approval for a wind farm in the Scottish Borders despite the project application being rejected three times since 2020.

Energiekontor UK Ltd planned to develop the site near Heriot in the Moorfoot Hills south of Edinburgh with eight 150-metre turbines capable of generating 36MW.


The project was first given the green light in January 2025 by a Scottish Government reporter, but following an appeal lodged by a company that owns the nearby Raeburn Farm, Court of Session appeal judges have now upheld the arguments made by the farm’s lawyers.

Lawyers instructed by Raeburn Farm argued the reporter did not follow correct legal proceedings when arriving at their decision.

The submitted proposal included plans for the construction of eight turbines and other infrastructure, but did not provide sufficient details of the off-site grid connection required for sending generated power to the electrical grid.

As a result, Raeburn’s lawyers argued the approval process could not have considered the environmental impact and was therefore unlawful.

On behalf of the judges – Lady Wise, Lord Pentland and Lord Ericht – Lady Wise ruled there were oversights in the reporter’s approval process and “failing to conduct the necessary fact specific evaluation of the proposal”.

She wrote, “It was incumbent upon him to do so before reaching a conclusion on whether the wind farm and grid connection constituted a single project for which an EIA (Environmental Impact Assessment) report that analysed the potentially significant cumulative effects of both aspects was required.

Appeal judges overturned Government approval for a wind farm in the Scottish Borders

|

PA

“We reject the submission made at the hearing before us by Senior Counsel for the respondents that any error by the reporter on this point was not a material one,” she said, reaffirming, “this was a material error”.

The trio of judges reversed the decision made in January 2025 and instructed it be reevaluated by “a different reporter for a fresh decision”.

The Scottish Borders Council first denied the application in 2020 due to the “unacceptable significant adverse impacts on the landscape”.

The developer revised their project plans to relocate the turbines and increase the original 130m height to 150m, resubmitting the proposal in 2024.

The Scottish Borders Council first denied the application in 2020

|

PA

Council planning officers initially approved the revision, but later reversed their position following significant public outcry, rejecting the plans for a second time and reiterated “significant landscape and visual impacts”.

The second Council denial prompted Energiekontor UK to successfully appeal the decision to the Scottish Government.

In his report, the government reporter at the centre of Raeburn Farm’s appeal noted the development would be responsible for “significant adverse landscape and visual effects”, but accepted “”this is to be expected for a proposal of this kind”.

Though relief at the court’s denial of Energiekontor’s application may be short-lived, community action groups are now looking upon the Wull Muir decision as a case study for other ongoing disputes.

Lyndsey Ward, an admin of the Communities B4 Power Companies Facebook Group, has been pushing back on wind farm developers for 15 years.

Following Lady Wise’s judgement, she wrote, “It makes my heart sing to see Energiekontor going through the wringer.

“What an appalling company they are: cocky, dismissive and smug are the words that come to mind after attending their ‘consultations’ in my community.”

Ms Ward welcomed the “court slap for Wull Muir wind abomination” for not considering the grid connection.

Referencing other Energiekontor development proposals, she said: “they have already had a push back in Sutherland for their unbelievable Strath Oykel development that the witless Scottish government passed despite reporters saying no.”

She says she is “aiming for the hat-trick here in Kilmorack”.

Six years after Scottish Borders Council first denied Energiekontor’s applications, the options laid out in Lady Wise’s judgement means that if the developer plans to proceed with the Wull Muir project, it will be required to conduct a thorough environmental impact assessment – including the infrastructure required in exporting electricity to the grid – to be reconsidered for approval.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Keep Reading

Car explodes outside Belfast police station in suspected ‘New IRA’ attack

Palace holding talks over plans for King Charles’ US visit after Washington shooting | UK News

History made as first official sub-two-hour race set on the capital’s streets

Mother and child killed after experiencing ‘difficulty’ in popular park

Firefighters tackle huge blaze at base used by US Air Force during Iran war operations

Warning as emergency tackle flames at RAF Fairford | UK News

The Epsom rape crime that never happened | UK News

A ‘bruising week’ for Sir Keir and ‘Order Andrew to give evidence’ | UK News

Why the voice note craze is yet to truly explode in Britain | UK News

Editors Picks

‘Kick him out!’ Labour MPs urged to ‘grow a backbone’ and boot PM

26 April 2026

King Charles signals possible changes to US state visit in fresh statement after White House shooting

26 April 2026

Lloyds Bank, HSBC and NatWest issue major customer rule update

26 April 2026

Fuel duty revenue falls as drivers cut back on driving amid rising costs and global tensions

26 April 2026

Subscribe to News

Get the latest Brittan News and Updates directly to your inbox.

Latest News

Palace holding talks over plans for King Charles’ US visit after Washington shooting | UK News

26 April 2026

Who is Sabastian Sawe? Kenya’s hero in London runs historic sub two-hour marathon

26 April 2026

History made as first official sub-two-hour race set on the capital’s streets

26 April 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest TikTok Instagram
© 2026 British Bulletin. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Advertise
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.