British BulletinBritish Bulletin
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Health
  • Sports
  • Tech & Science
  • Travel
  • Spotlight
  • More
    • Press Release
What's On

Enzo Maresca signs three-year Man City deal after agreeing Chelsea compensation

29 June 2026

Reform UK announces candidate to replace Andy Burnham as Mayor of Greater Manchester

29 June 2026

Royals arrive for first day of tournament

29 June 2026

Martin Lewis issues urgent energy bill warning to British Gas, Octopus Energy and EDF customers

29 June 2026

BBC Dinnerladies reboot sparks debate as sitcom reworked for stage 10 years after Victoria Wood’s death

29 June 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Web Stories
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
British Bulletin
Subscribe
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Health
  • Sports
  • Tech & Science
  • Travel
  • Spotlight
  • More
    • Press Release
British BulletinBritish Bulletin
Home » Are Chelsea-Strasbourg transfer deals bad for football?
Sports

Are Chelsea-Strasbourg transfer deals bad for football?

By britishbulletin.com5 February 20263 Mins Read
Are Chelsea-Strasbourg transfer deals bad for football?
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

Chelsea and Strasbourg came together under Todd Boehly and Clearlake Capital’s BlueCo group in 2023.

Across the first two years Strasbourg got the best of the deal.

Six players left Chelsea for the French club, five on loan and one permanently.

Strasbourg were able to spend money they could only have dreamed about.

In the three years before BlueCo, Strasbourg’s total transfer fees paid per season were £6.1m, £3.9m and £9.5m.

In the following three seasons Strasbourg spent £52.6m, £53.6m and £96.5m. They were the biggest-spending club in France last summer, outgunning even Paris St-Germain (£89.2m).

Those additional resources helped Strasbourg challenge for a place in the Champions League last season.

But last summer the way the two clubs did business began to change. The pendulum would swing towards the dominant MCO partner in Chelsea.

Take central defender Mamadou Sarr, who in June joined Chelsea from Strasbourg on a permanent deal.

The 20-year-old made only one appearance for Chelsea as a substitute at the Fifa Club World Cup.

In August he went back to Strasbourg on loan. On Monday he was recalled by Chelsea.

BlueCo would argue this is a key part of player development – that Sarr would get regular football at Strasbourg and return to Stamford Bridge a better player.

Then there is the case of Ishe Samuels-Smith.

The left-back moved from Chelsea to Strasbourg in July. He was then re-signed by Chelsea in September – and immediately loaned to Swansea City.

In the world of multi-club ownership there is logic to it.

With Ben Chilwell not part of Enzo Maresca’s plans the full-back was sent to Strasbourg on a free transfer. The Ligue 1 club had also resolved a contract dispute with another defender, Ismael Doukoure.

It left Samuels-Smith as a spare part in Alsace.

Rather than leave the 19-year-old struggling for first-team football, Chelsea effectively refunded the £6.5m transfer fee and sent him to the Championship club.

Club captain Emmanuel Emegha is already confirmed to be the next on the conveyor belt to Stamford Bridge.

The 20-year-old striker, one of BlueCo’s first signings at Strasbourg, will join Chelsea at the end of the season.

The club’s ultras – long-time critics of the association with BlueCo – demanded he hand back the captain’s armband.

Outsiders see players (and indeed the head coach) jumping around from club to club at the behest of Chelsea.

Take Aaron Anselmino. The centre-back spent the first half of the season on loan at Borussia Dortmund from Chelsea.

Yet when Chelsea wanted Sarr in their first team, Anselmino was recalled from the Bundesliga club and sent to fill the hole in the Strasbourg squad.

Anselmino was reportedly in tears when he left Dortmund.

Chelsea were shifting chess pieces to suit their own strategy.

Yet recalling loan players from one club to send them to another should not be seen as special to a multi-club ownership structure.

For instance, last month Manchester United brought Harry Amass back from a loan spell at Sheffield Wednesday and sent him to Norwich City instead.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Keep Reading

Enzo Maresca signs three-year Man City deal after agreeing Chelsea compensation

Rob Edwards turns down approach from Burnley

Ben Stokes retires: England captain rejects suggestions he could reverse retirement

World Cup 2026 exit leaves South Korean football in crisis

Could a heatwave make World Cup matches ‘unsafe’ this week?

World Cup quiz: How well do you know the group stage in numbers?

Robert Lewandowski: Polish striker set for MLS transfer move with Chicago Fire

Wimbledon 2026: Aryna Sabalenka and Jannik Sinner among players to resume full media duties after prize money protest

World Cup 2026: Pampered, protected & primed – so why didn’t Scotland players perform?

Editors Picks

Reform UK announces candidate to replace Andy Burnham as Mayor of Greater Manchester

29 June 2026

Royals arrive for first day of tournament

29 June 2026

Martin Lewis issues urgent energy bill warning to British Gas, Octopus Energy and EDF customers

29 June 2026

BBC Dinnerladies reboot sparks debate as sitcom reworked for stage 10 years after Victoria Wood’s death

29 June 2026

Subscribe to News

Get the latest Brittan News and Updates directly to your inbox.

Latest News

Driving law changes you missed in June

29 June 2026

Ex-MP Craig Williams pleads guilty over general election betting offence | UK News

29 June 2026

Rob Edwards turns down approach from Burnley

29 June 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest TikTok Instagram
© 2026 British Bulletin. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Advertise
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.