Two Church of England dioceses have been given official warnings by the Charity Commission over “mismanagement” of safeguarding complaints against the former Bishop of Liverpool.
Former bishop John Perumbalath resigned in January last year after reports emerged concerning accusations by two women, one of whom was a fellow bishop. He has continued to deny the allegations.
The commission found there had been a “failure to properly handle” the allegations and maintain “appropriate oversight of safeguarding”.
While the Liverpool Diocesan Board accepted the commission’s findings, the Bishop of Chelmsford disagreed with its conclusions and called the official warning “disproportionate”.
The first woman had accused Dr Perumbalath of kissing her without consent and groping her in Chelmsford, Essex, where he was the Bishop of Bradwell, on separate occasions between 2019 and 2023.
Last year, the Church of England said that its investigations found there was “no case to answer” with regard to allegations of misconduct in Chelmsford.
Dr Perumbalath went on to leave the Chelmsford diocese to take up a more senior role as Bishop of Liverpool where the second complaint was lodged.
The Right Reverend Bev Mason said she was sexually harassed by him. She had been Bishop of Warrington at the time she identified herself as one of the women.
The Church of England said the legal timeframe to investigate that second complaint had expired.
There were widespread calls for the bishop to step aside after Channel 4 aired the allegations against him, with church leaders calling his position “untenable”.
Dr Perumbalath resigned, saying at the time it was “not a resignation occasioned by fault or by any admission of liability”.
He has also previously said he had “consistently denied the allegations” made against him and criticised what he described as a “rush to judgement” and a “trial by media”.
The Charity Commission investigated the Liverpool Diocesan Board of Finance and the Chelmsford Diocesan Board of Finance, and has now issued an official warning to both – the first time it has taken such action against the Church at either a national or diocese level.
The charity regulator found that a “lack of appropriate procedures and processes” meant that proper action was not taken and said failings in handling allegations amounted to mismanagement.
The boards of finance, which exist to assist and promote the work of the Church and the dioceses, are registered charities.
Charity Commission chief executive David Holdsworth said: “Trustees must be able to effectively challenge the behaviour of powerful individuals, including where that power derives from spiritual leadership.”
In a statement, the Liverpool Diocesan Board of Finance apologised for the errors identified by the Commission.
“We accept the commission’s findings and apologise for the shortcomings identified,” its chair of trustees said.
“We have already made changes to strengthen reporting and governance processes, and we commit to ongoing learning, accountability and continuous improvement.”
But the Bishop of Chelmsford, the Right Reverend Dr Guli Francis-Dehqani, and the Chelmsford diocesan safeguarding officer Amanda Knight said they were “disappointed” by the decision to issue an official warning, which they believed was “disproportionate”.
They wrote in a joint statement that they disagreed with some of the Commission’s conclusions.
“We take safeguarding in the Diocese of Chelmsford extremely seriously and our response to this complex case involving a former bishop in the diocese was robust and survivor-led.”
They added that they were “committed to working with the regulator to improve our procedures” and that many of the recommendations had already been or were in the process of being enacted.
Late last year the Charity Commission issued a statement saying the Church of England nationally needed to work faster to implement the changes it had promised to make the Church a safer place.
David Holdsworth, the commission’s chief executive, told the : “The Church has to move away from defensiveness to accountability and make sure they have the systems, the processes, and importantly the leadership behaviours that ensure that people who come into contact with its churches are safe.”